Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Josh May's avatar

“Harris and her party were so lacking in any positive vision that the public used progressive culture to fill in the blanks.”

Great point, although I’d add: Just because Harris campaigned more as a centrist doesn’t mean voters believed she was centrist. Instead, they believed Trump’s ads about positions she held and defended over decades. Even if she had a more positive vision, it would’ve needed to be authentic, believable.

Michael Dickson's avatar

Thanks. Political writing so often feels just like self-promotion, moaning, or worse, often with little to no display of self-knowledge. Your writing is different from that 'norm', and I appreciate it for that reason.

My extended family, and many of my acquaintances, are Trump supporters---some gleefully, some holding their nose---and it does seem that the reasons you give are their reasons.

There certainly is a gulf, as you point out. I recently told a colleague (academic---i.e., 95% chance that this person is 'lefty elite') that I had returned from a visit to see my family in rural Florida (panhandle). Her response: "Ugh, I couldn't stand to be there." Apparently she was serious.

How can we say to people "yes, he is the enemy of people who wrongly treat you with contempt, but it is still wrong to empower a moral reprobate"? I mean: How can we say it without coming across as (or being!) just *another* contemptuous 'elite'? That's a tough one to figure out.

72 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?